The above clip was taken from an interview given by Shaykh Abu-Ishaq al-Huwayni on the Egyptian satellite television station al-Hikma on 7 July 2011. Al-Huwayni here explains that whoever insults Muhammad, even if he later repents, must be killed.
Later in the interview, al-Huwayni went on to contrast this with the case of one who insults Allah. He said that insulting Allah of course makes one an infidel, which is agreed to by all Islamic scholars, yet the one who insults Allah is not killed--he is merely called to repentance. This is because even if the whole world insults Allah, it does not matter to him--it does not hurt him.
After recounting a hadith regarding Muhammad being mocked by poetry from the Quraysh, al-Huwayni explained that Muhammad "had complete authority to waive his right (to kill those who mocked him). But the ruler does not have the authority to waive the Prophet's right." Al-Huwayni reported that Muhammad could waive this right whenever he wanted, but after his death he retained this right, meaning no one could waive the right for him. That is why those who insult the Prophet now must be killed.
He then narrated another hadith in which Abu-Bakr, the first rightly-guided caliph of Islam, became furious with someone who had mocked him. Abu-Barza offered to kill this man for Abu-Bakr. Abu-Bakr explained, however, that this right (i.e. to kill the one who mocks the ruler) was not given to anyone after Muhammad; or in other words, only Muhammad had the right to kill those who mocked him.
He said all of this in the context of the current controversy in Egypt with the Christian businessman Naguib Sawiris, a billionaire and founder of the Free Egyptians Party. Late last month Sawiris tweeted a picture of Mickey Mouse wearing a Muslim beard and jilbab, and Minnie Mouse wearing a niqab, which was considered to be mocking Islam. Al-Huwayni did not say explicitly that Sawiris should be killed for mocking Islam, but did say that all of his companies should be boycotted, even if he only owns 10% share in the company.
Subtitled video above, transcript below:
Whoever insults the Prophet (PBUH), if he later comes and apologizes, and kisses the shoes (of the ruler), and says, “I want all Muslims, every one, to return and strike me with the soles of their feet”—does the ruler have the right to accept this?
I bring up this question, as it was asked of me. The answer is that it is not permissible for anyone to accept this. Then what do we do with him? We kill him! But he told you that he repented. We still kill him, even if he repents!
How does one go about insulting a DEAD GUY? Only in the world of twisted religions can you pull that one off.....
ReplyDeletemurder.. the only way of defending the indefensible.
ReplyDeleteIf only Mo can forgive someone for insulting him, then ONLY Mo should have the right to kill him.
ReplyDeleteF**K mo. Now come and get me.
ReplyDeleteA genocidal warlord, caravan raiding bandit, terrorist and pervert as well
ReplyDelete- it seems that any real truth seems to hurt muslims and no wonder as they don't want the word to get about !
An illiterate,murdering,itinerant,paederast who invented his own
ReplyDeleteGod and terrorised others to submit to him/her!
Are statements of recorded fact insults?
I think we should be told by "scholars" of the death cult!
The hard truth about Muhammed, as recorded for posterity in Islamic scripture, is that far from being a virtuous 'holy prophet', Muhammed was actually a classic sadistic sociopath.
ReplyDeleteMuhammed was a mass murderer, a serial rapist, a human slaver and slave trafficker, a child rapist, a contemptuous misogynist, a sex slaver and sex trafficker, a looting stealing thief, a perfidious liar, a sadistic torturer, an obsessive decapitator, an inhuman mutilator, a savage limb amputator, an intolerant bigot, a genocidist and a self proclaimed terrorist.
Far from being a virtuous holy man, Muhammed was nothing more than a 7th century Arabian Charles Manson, just more successfully evil.
Muhammed was, by any objective standard, one of the most vile and repugnant men in the pantheon of human history...a grand mal narcissist consumed by savage power, asymptotic material greed, and unquenchable sexual lust.
Like Charles Manson, Muhammed should have been incarcerated, not venerated. Muhammed should be reviled, not revered. Yet this is the man who is the moral standard bearer for 1.1 billion Muslims.
Muslims know the truth about Muhammed, and they know that his barbaric immorality and savage inhumanity cannot be reconciled with modern humanity and modern human values. Thus, they dissemble and lie to perpetuate this grand myth, the greatest fraud ever perpetrated upon humanity.
And when confronted with the truth about their barbarian prince, Muslims only have two options:
1) to accept the truth which destroys the very foundation of the cult of Islam, or
2) they must defend the indefensible in the only way they can - though willful denial followed by violence, riots, fear, intimidation, destruction and murder.
The hatred, threats and intimidation espoused by this modern day Islamic cleric, Shaykh Abu-Ishaq al-Huwayni, are just the latest proof of this unassailable theorem.
Please copy, paste and circulate this commentary. Please help spread the truth about Muhammed.
~ The Infidel Alliance